For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending .md to those URLs or by sending Accept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
DYNATYZE
DYNATYZE
Loading
Game Center
polling · 1800s tick · as of 12:20 AM ET · 16 to play
Los Angeles Chargers 20 at Washington Commanders 16. Final.
Commanders -2.5 upset
The verdict · 2021 Week 1
Los Angeles Chargers 20, Commanders 16 — with the result never quite settled.
It turned at Q4 12:16, 1st and 10, on Antonio Gibson — 29.2 win-probability points to the Chargers on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q4 12:16 · 1st and 10
Antonio Gibson
Chargers
(12:16) 71-W.Schweitzer reported in as eligible. 24-A.Gibson right end to WAS 4 for no gain (44-K.White; 26-A.Samuel). FUMBLES (44-K.White), RECOVERED by LAC-52-K.Fackrell at WAS 3.
U 45.5 ✓
Commanders closed -2.5 and lost outright — an upset against the closing number.
Los Angeles Chargers 20–16. Biggest swing: Q4 12:16, Chargers +29.2% win probability on one snap.
29.2
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
Justin HerbertCommandersQ3 6:00(6:00) (Shotgun) 10-J.Herbert sacked at WAS 15 for -8 yards (90-M.Sweat). FUMBLES (90-M.Sweat) [90-M.Sweat], ball out of bounds in End Zone, Touchback. The Replay Official reviewed the fumble ruling, and the play was Upheld. The ruling on the field stands.
22.1pts
William JacksonCommandersQ4 12:23(12:23) 10-J.Herbert pass deep right intended for 82-S.Anderson INTERCEPTED by 23-W.Jackson at WAS 4. 23-W.Jackson pushed ob at WAS 4 for no gain (82-S.Anderson).
22.4pts
What separated them
Third down
Chargers won this one — 14 of 18 on third down, against Commanders at 3 of 10 on third down.
Chargersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Explosive plays
Chargers won this one — 6 chunk plays, against Commanders at 2 chunk plays.
Chargersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Chargers won this one — +0.11 expected points per snap, against Commanders at -0.10 expected points per snap.
Chargersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Staying on schedule
Chargers won this one — 48% of snaps stayed on schedule, against Commanders at 41% of snaps stayed on schedule.
1 other measure was inside a third of the league's own spread — two clubs doing the same thing, so it is not shown.
Drawn from the weekly play-by-play file, which paints on the Monday 4:00 AM ET sync after the game.
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
How the game was won
The model and the market were 1.6 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 6 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Chargers.
MarketModelmodel higher on Commandershigher on Chargers165 of 176 plays carry both curves
(12:16) 71-W.Schweitzer reported in as eligible. 24-A.Gibson right end to WAS 4 for no gain (44-K.White; 26-A.Samuel). FUMBLES (44-K.White), RECOVERED by LAC-52-K.Fackrell at WAS 3.
Swing −29.2 for CommandersExpected points −6.02 for CommandersModel and market agree here.play 139
The solid line is the betting market's home win probability; the dashed line is the play-by-play model's. The shaded band between them is the disagreement — emerald where the model liked the home team more, red where it liked the away team more. Drag across the curve or use arrow keys to replay the game; gold diamonds mark the biggest swings.
Highest-leverage plays
4th · 12:16LAC +29% win prob(12:16) 71-W.Schweitzer reported in as eligible. 24-A.Gibson right end to WAS 4 for no gain (44-K.White; 26-A.Samuel). FUMBLES (44-K.White), RECOVERED by LAC-52-K.Fackrell at WAS 3.
4th · 12:23LAC +22% win prob(12:23) 10-J.Herbert pass deep right intended for 82-S.Anderson INTERCEPTED by 23-W.Jackson at WAS 4. 23-W.Jackson pushed ob at WAS 4 for no gain (82-S.Anderson).
3rd · 6:00LAC +22% win prob(6:00) (Shotgun) 10-J.Herbert sacked at WAS 15 for -8 yards (90-M.Sweat). FUMBLES (90-M.Sweat) [90-M.Sweat], ball out of bounds in End Zone, Touchback. The Replay Official reviewed the fumble ruling, and the play was Upheld. The ruling on the field stands.
3rd · 11:41WAS +14% win prob(11:41) (Shotgun) 4-T.Heinicke pass deep left to 17-T.McLaurin ran ob at LAC 11 for 34 yards. Penalty on LAC-43-M.Davis, Illegal Contact, declined.
3rd · 9:33WAS +11% win prob(9:33) (Shotgun) 10-J.Herbert pass short left to 87-J.Cook to WAS 34 for 23 yards (25-B.St-Juste).
4th · 8:44LAC +11% win prob
SettledThe modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
The margin ledger
Mike Williams's 3-yard touchdown catch with 11:25 left in the 4th put Los Angeles Chargers ahead for good. It was the last score of the day.
Chargers ahead 7–1 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — explosive plays.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.35 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
+0.11Chargers: +0.11 expected points added per play
−0.10Commanders: −0.10 expected points added per play
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
+0.21Chargers: +0.21 expected points added per play
−0.05Commanders: −0.05 expected points added per play
Running itexpected points added per rush
−0.08Chargers: −0.08 expected points added per play
−0.16Commanders: −0.16 expected points added per play
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Chargers ran 75 snaps at a 65% dropback rate against Commanders’s 49 at 53%. Red-zone trips: Chargers 7, Commanders 2.
NoteChargers won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.11 expected points added per play vs -0.10.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
The Read
7 of 8 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
highest in the league that weekAgainst the weekTendencies
LAC's sack or hit rate, 26.9%, was the highest of the 32 team-games charted in week 1 — 3.8 points clear of the next team along.
2.0 times their own weekly swing above their number.
26 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 6.5 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
Was this normal for them?
7 of 8 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
their week-to-week swingall 32 teams
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -22 pts to 20 pts
off script — got home · +13.0 vs their 13.9%, and they swing ±6.5 week to week (+2.01× that swing) · 26 dropbacks
Commanders10.2%
inside their normal wobble · −5.3 vs their 15.5%, and they swing ±7.1 week to week (−0.74× that swing) · 49 dropbacks
Play-action rate
Charted from 2022. The columns exist for 2021 and are entirely empty, which is not a season of data.
Blitz rate sent
Charted from 2022. The columns exist for 2021 and are entirely empty, which is not a season of data.
NoteLAC's sack or hit rate was the night's one real departure: 26.9%, 13.0 points above their season mean of 13.9% and 2.0 times their own 6.5-point weekly swing.
The Game Day Roster
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
4 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 1 line has no expected-points read and sits off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The field map
Every snap, where it happened
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Commanders attack right, the Chargers attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
Chargers←Commanders→
Q1Q2Q3Q4
W.Schweitzer reported−30% win probabilitymoment 4 of 4
(12:16) 71-W.Schweitzer reported in as eligible. 24-A.Gibson right end to WAS 4 for no gain (44-K.White; 26-A.Samuel). FUMBLES (44-K.White), RECOVERED by LAC-52-K.Fackrell at WAS 3.
Q4 12:16 · Commanders · 1st & 10 at WAS 4 · lost 1 · -6.02 EP · −29.9% win probability
163 snaps placed · 13 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
The Film Room · post-game
Post-game film: 176 plays across 18 drives, personnel groupings on 176 snaps. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
Possession by possession
The field rail
8 of 18 drives ended in points. The longest march was WAS moving 81 yards from the WAS 19 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; WAS attacks right, LAC attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Every snap
Play stream
176 of 176 plays
Team
Quarter
Down
Play type
Expected points added
Event
Charted
Plays shown
176
EPA per play
-0.02
Success rate
42%
Yards
683
Who was on the field
Personnel groupings
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. The names of the eleven on the field are only recorded from 2023 onward, so this game gives the grouping without the roster.
Chargers1 RB, 1 TE, 3 WR40+0.3175%
Commanders1 RB, 1 TE, 3 WR32+0.1650%
Chargers1 RB, 2 TE, 2 WR21-0.1552%
Commanders1 RB, 2 TE, 2 WR9-0.3333%
Chargers2 RB, 1 TE, 2 WR5-0.5560%
Commanders2 RB, 1 TE, 2 WR5-0.1440%
Chargers1 RB, 1 TE, 2 WR5+0.0940%
Commanders1 RB, 2 TE, 1 WR2——
Chargers1 RB, 2 TE, 1 WR1——
Chargers2 RB, 0 TE, 3 WR1——
Chargers1 RB, 3 TE, 1 WR1——
Chargers0 RB, 1 TE, 4 WR1——
Commanders1 RB, 1 TE, 2 WR1——
snapsepapass rate
176 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
Every play
Ball
When
Play
Only
Who
176 plays
Bar length is win probability the play moved
1st quarter39 plays
Chargers6Commanders0
Chargers7Commanders0
Touchdown13 plays, from the Chargers 25 to the Commanders 3
Punt5 plays, from the Commanders 26 to the Commanders 32
Punt4 plays, from the Chargers 12 to the Chargers 15
Chargers7Commanders3
Field goal6 plays, from the Chargers 48 to the Chargers 12
Punt6 plays, from the Chargers 17 to the Chargers 32
The period ended4 plays, from the Commanders 29 to the Commanders 37
2nd quarter55 plays
Chargers7Commanders6
Field goal5 plays, from the Commanders 43 to the Chargers 22
Chargers10Commanders6
Field goal12 plays, from the Chargers 9 to the Commanders 15
Punt5 plays
Chargers13Commanders6
Field goal24 plays, from the Chargers 26 to the Commanders 6
Chargers13Commanders9
Field goal8 plays, from the Commanders 25 to the Chargers 30
3rd quarter36 plays
FormationShotgunOffense on the fieldOne back, one tight end and three receiversDefense on the fieldFour linemen, two linebackers and five backsRoute runGoCoverageCover 3, three deepMan or zoneZoneIn the boxFive defendersRushing the passerFivePressure (charted)The passer was kept cleanTime to throw3.0 seconds
Chargers13Commanders15
Chargers13Commanders16
Touchdown10 plays, from the Commanders 19 to the Chargers 11
FormationShotgunOffense on the fieldOne back, one tight end and three receiversDefense on the fieldFour linemen, two linebackers and five backsRoute runOutCoverageCover 4, quartersMan or zoneZoneIn the boxSeven defendersRushing the passerFourPressure (charted)The passer was pressuredTime to throw2.8 seconds
FormationShotgunOffense on the fieldOne back, two tight ends and two receiversDefense on the fieldFour linemen, three linebackers and four backsIn the boxSeven defendersRushing the passerFour
Drive ended13 plays, from the Chargers 25 to the Commanders 7
The period ended13 plays, from the Commanders 43 to the Chargers 24
4th quarter46 plays
No good3 plays
FormationShotgunOffense on the fieldTwo backs and three receiversDefense on the fieldFour linemen, two linebackers and five backsRoute runOutCoverageCover 4, quartersMan or zoneZoneIn the boxSix defendersRushing the passerFourPressure (charted)The passer was kept cleanTime to throw3.2 seconds
FormationI formationOffense on the fieldOne back, three tight ends and one receiverDefense on the fieldFour linemen, three linebackers and four backsRoute runWheelCoverageCover 4, quartersMan or zoneZoneIn the boxSeven defendersRushing the passerThreePressure (charted)The passer was kept cleanTime to throw3.2 seconds
Intercepted5 plays, from the Chargers 41 to the Commanders 20
FormationSingle backOffense on the fieldSix linemen, one back, two tight ends and one receiverDefense on the fieldFour linemen, three linebackers and four backsIn the boxSeven defenders
Fumble lost1 play
FormationEmpty backfieldOffense on the fieldOne tight end and four receiversDefense on the fieldFour linemen, two linebackers and five backsRoute runGoCoverageCover 0, no safety helpMan or zoneManIn the boxSix defendersRushing the passerFourPressure (charted)The passer was kept cleanTime to throw1.6 seconds
Chargers19Commanders16
Chargers20Commanders16
Touchdown4 plays
Punt13 plays, from the Commanders 25 to the Chargers 38
FormationShotgunOffense on the fieldOne back, one tight end and three receiversDefense on the fieldFour linemen, two linebackers and five backsRoute runHitchCoverageCover 4, quartersMan or zoneZoneIn the boxSix defendersRushing the passerFourPressure (charted)The passer was kept cleanTime to throw2.8 seconds
The period ended20 plays, from the Chargers 18 to the Commanders 7
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Betting context
Closing spread
Commanders -2.5
Closing total
45.5
Chargers moneyline
+117
Commanders moneyline
-129
Commanders closed -2.5 and lost outright — an upset against the closing number.
Total closed 45.5; the game landed 36 — under by 9.5.
Conditions and crew
Game environment
Venue
FedExField
Roof / surface
outdoors · grass
Kickoff weather
Warm, 84°F at kickoff; a light breeze at 9 mph out of the south-west; clear.
Referee
Alex Kemp
Rest
Chargers 7 days · Commanders 7 days
Coaches
Brandon Staley vs Ron Rivera
(8:44) (No Huddle, Shotgun) 4-T.Heinicke pass short right to 2-D.Brown to LAC 38 for no gain (33-D.James). PENALTY on WAS-13-A.Humphries, Low Block, 15 yards, enforced at LAC 38 - No Play.
4th · 5:29WAS +11% win prob(5:29) (Shotgun) 10-J.Herbert pass short middle to 13-K.Allen to LAC 29 for 17 yards (20-B.McCain).
4th · 14:20LAC +10% win prob(14:20) 3-D.Hopkins 51 yard field goal is No Good, Wide Left, Center-54-C.Cheeseman, Holder-5-T.Way.